Star Trek: The Next Generation, Seasons One-Four
c. 1987-1991
I’m mostly writing this post for Emily, but also because not having seen Star Trek is worth like 1,000 demerits in the circles I seem to be running around in these days. I’ve been slowly making my way through the canon ever since I saw J.J. Abrams’ fabulous re-imagining last May and realized I needed to educate myself in this huge cultural milestone that’s been happening since 1966. As of this moment, I’ve got seasons one and two of The Original Series under my belt, and one through four of The Next Generation (from here on out, referred to as TOS and TNG, respectively). That’s just over half of each. I feel like this is good for my nerd cred.
I was only two years old when the TNG pilot, “Encounter at Farpoint,” aired, and as neither of my parents gave two shits about science fiction or fantasy, I didn’t realize that I was a fan until I was sixteen years old, when I accidentally happened upon Star Wars on TV. I’d heard of Star Wars, of course. I’d known that Darth Vader was Luke’s father since I was in kindergarten, even if I didn’t really know what that meant, but I’d never considered that it might be something I would actually like. I spent the next two years obsessively re-watching the original trilogy on VHS and buying Star Wars books (officially licensed fanfic, basically) at Barnes & Noble every weekend. Part of the fun, I think, is that I was stepping into this pre-existing world that people had been playing around in for years. It felt legendary. But the other part is that for the first time, I was discovering that I fucking love science fiction. Cheesy, operatic, bad, awesome, epic, or tiny. I love it all.
But even as I was busy doing all this discovering, meeting Buffy, Angel, Firefly, Battlestar Galactica, Stargate, and Farscape along the way, I’d never seen more than five minutes of any kind of Star Trek at a time. In fact, you might say that I was studiously avoiding it, mostly due to a seriously crazy Star Wars fan mentality. “Star Trek!” I would scoff, “STAR TREK! Ha!” And also, “As if!” But, hey, J.J. Abrams, and hey, I’m fucked.
But I’m here to talk about TNG, so let’s get back to that. I was warned heading in that the first season and a half is kind of shitty, so I wasn’t surprised when that turned out to be the case. Roddenberry seemed to be trying to recreate the magic of TOS instead of making something new. None of the characters were particularly complex or even likable (excepting Data, of course), and in some cases, downright annoying. Plots were mostly emotionless AND kind of stupid (and since plot is the focus of most TNG episodes up until season four, this is a huge problem). Nothing really clicked. But slowly, this series has crept up on me. The first concrete episode I can point to is “Measure of a Man,” and I don’t think it’s a coincidence that that episode deals largely in character stuff, not just philosophy. TNG episodes (and TOS episodes) tend to feel more like case studies in ideas than they do episodes of television. Every week we meet people we will most likely never see again and deal with problems that won’t matter in the future. There’s nothing to tie you in place as a viewer, unless you super really love the “thing of the week,” whatever it happens to be. But in “Measure of a Man,” in which Data’s worth as a sentient being is literally put on trial, and by Riker and Picard no less, we see real character growth and as a result, experience emotional investment. That was really the first episode where I was like, “Okay, yeah, Picard is a bad ass,” and where I found myself actively caring if these characters lived or died.
It’s hard to go into too much detail about four seasons of a television program in this small space, so I think some lists would be helpful in categorizing the things I find engaging about the show, and the things which don’t work for me, for whatever reason. Let’s start with that second thing, which I like to refer to as ‘stupid.’ Some things that I would put into this category: Worf’s hair, the Prime Directive (seriously, don’t get me started on this), Geordi in general, attempts to justify beaming technology (which is frankly terrifying), most Klingons, when Worf’s girlfriend dies, Worf episodes without Worf’s girlfriend, Deanna’s entire wardrobe, 24th century medical technology (ooh! let me wave this thingy over you for a sec, okay, got it! and wooosh! you’re all better now), Wesley’s wide-eyed innocence and general Mary Sue Roddenberry stand-in qualities in season one (quite frankly, I enjoy him in the other seasons, so suck it, Trekkers), and of course, the Ferengi. Stuff that I find engaging: the Borg, Riker’s beard and general Riker-ness, Picard’s shiny head, Picard’s voice, Picard in general post season one, Data, Q, Worf’s girlfriend, time travel, killing Tasha Yar, bringing back Tasha Yar and making her awesome, watching the show learn how to not suck, Locutus of Borg, Lwaxana Troi, Data getting a daughter, that episode where Picard wears tiny swim trunks, and all the shiny Enterprise bedsheets, which are hilarious.
As of “Redemption, Part I,” I still find the show’s general structure harder to get engaged with than, say, a more emotional show like Farscape, or even Stargate, but I’ve increasingly found myself enjoying it on its own terms, and even occasionally, loving it. I still don’t really like Worf or Geordi episodes, mostly because the Klingons bore me, and I think the writers don’t really know how to give Geordi anything useful to do, but I can potentially foresee myself thinking they don’t suck so much in the future. What I can say about TNG is that not many single episodes were so egregiously bad that I remember them. Mostly, I just have this sort of blur in my memory from “bad” episodes. An exception to this is the season two ender, “Shades of Grey,” which is a clip-show, and not even a partially good one. It is god-awful from start to finish (although to be fair to the show, I believe a Writer’s Strike effected the production of that particular season, and that episode was not originally meant to end it). And then there were the episodes where I was like YEAH! This is AWESOME! Some of those include “The Measure of a Man” (as detailed above), “Q Who” (which introduces the Borg Collective), “Deja Q” (my favorite episode, I think, because it is HILARIOUS), “Yesterday’s Enterprise” (Tasha Yar returning from the dead, trippy well done time travel), “Hollow Pursuits” (because of Broccoli), “First Contact” (which is the only Star Trek episode to be told from the POV of the “aliens”), “The Best of Both Worlds, I & II” (obviously . . . I would have to be an idiot not to love these episodes), and “Half a Life” (because David Ogden Stiers as Lwaxana’s love interest is just magnetic, he’s such a good actor).
Ultimately, I don’t think, even after I eventually finish both TOS and TNG (and eventually TAS, DS9, VOY, and ENT) that I will consider myself a “fan” of Star Trek on television (although I am certainly a fan of J.J. Abrams’s version, probably because Star Trek XI is highly emotional). I won’t consider my time wasted, however. Star Trek, the franchise, has had quite possibly the biggest influence on science fiction television, and even movies, maybe ever, and since I have now officially made it my goal to watch every single sci-fi and fantasy TV show ever created, I would certainly be remiss if I skipped the granddaddy of them all. (And yes, I’m serious about this goal. I have a giant list and a spread sheet, and I am very excited.) And hey, I never would have gotten to see Picard in those tiny swim trunks, so: win win.
I hate a fistful of datas. Worst episode in my mind.
Hi, I haven’t seen that one yet. It’s in season six. (And you call yourself a fan.)
So, did you hate this one?
It was okay. Probably my least favorite of the season, though.
Such a great goal. SOME day, I will watch.
Dr. Tim is a Star Trek fan. I consider this a win.
My h.s. band director tried to get us to go to him every year. He said we’d all cry. I never went. I don’t think I would have cried.
I have no idea what this is in reference to. Are you drunk?
It’s so cute (and sad) that you didn’t grow up with Star Trek. Sometimes I feel like the oldest person on the internet.
“tend to feel more like case studies in ideas”
Ashley, this is exactly what I’m feeling about Farscape. A hundred billion people have told me that I have to give Farscape some time. It will grow on me, and I will then see that it is awesome, right? While I’m still in Season 1 (I’m up to Durka Returns), I’m not feeling an obsession. I WANT TO FEEL AN OBSESSION. THAT IS WHAT I DEMAND OF MY TV exclamation point exclamation point exclamation point.
I feel the case study pattern strongly, and I keep comparing Farscape to TNG without recognizing the difference between the two. I’m glad you wrote about TNG because clearly there ARE major differences. I haven’t seen TNG for ages, so my memory of how weak some characters were has waned. But Geordi? Worf? Frack me. Geordi without his visor was even worse. It was like suddenly taking an X-Men’s power away. The dullest of the X-Men. It was possible for Joe Public to like TNG, but to love them, you needed to be a Trekkie.
So yes, Farscape is sexier (the ship! the make-up), and has more emotional depth without the viewer investing four seasons (I really enjoy the dynamics between Crichton and Sun), but I think I’m looking more for a drama, than a series of morality plays. Is that it? Am I the problem? Or is it still a matter of time?
God I miss BSG.
Farscape is the opposite of TNG, on purpose. I wrote an entire paper on this that I will be posting here at the end of the summer.
The next episode, “A Human Reaction,” should help you with the obsession, but seriously, Peefer? I promise you I PROMISE YOU that you should keep going because it is just as awesome as BSG (in it’s own Muppety BDSM way) by the end. Do you not remember how stunningly god-awful TNG was in the beginning?
I certainly haven’t given up on it, and I BELIEVE you when you say it’s worth it, but something has to change or develop for me to watch four seasons worth. (It’s four, isn’t it?)
I think I would have to rewatch TNG to appreciate the level of its stupidity and corniness. When it first ran, my girlfriend used to do me favours during the commercials, so my opinion is probably biased toward the positive.
Nice euphemism.
Part of the issue with the first season and a half is that there was a revolving door for script writers, mainly due to Roddenberry. Gene had the concept that in the future, there would be little or no conflict between the main characters. Nice idea, but it makes for bad drama.
Anyway, once you get to the mid-point of season two, Rick Berman and, more importantly, Michael Pillar start to slowly emerge as two driving forces behind what TNG eventually becomes–it embraces the characters and begins to develop them a bit. Yes, this does lead to some points where we get repetitive stories (in season five, Worf’s family crisis will threaten the ship every other week….or so it seems). Roddenberry’s declining health allows Pillar to really take over and make TNG into what most people remember it as.
There’s a quantum leap in storytelling between season two and three… and the series rides it for the next couple of years.
Anyway, welcome to the journey. I watched all the episodes as they aired and both TOS and TNG are among my comfort shows that I like to revisit from time to time and enjoy. I’ve seen both enough that I can recite dialogue with some of my favorites.
I’ll be interested to hear if you test the DS9 waters. If you like Farscape and shows like it, DS9 may be of interest. It’s the best of the modern Treks.
And I will be intrigued to see what you say about TOS
I fully plan on watching all the Treks, and I’ve heard that about DS9 before.
Thanks for commenting. How’d you find me?
You’ve heard it from ME!
(sorry, worst comment ever, but I gotta go to a meeting!)