I pride myself on only one thing: I read a lot of books, and I always have. Also, that’s a lie. I totally pride myself all over the place for other things like being able to remember everything Tracy Jordan has ever said and tying a knot in a cherry stem with my tongue and alphabetizing and cataloguing and making lists and also other stuff. So whatever, I’m a liar. But the point remains. I read a lot of books. I was such an asshole about it in my earlier years that I would regularly do things like ignore my sister and make her cry because I was reading, and my mom was always yanking books out of my hands to get me to do chores (this was before I discovered TV), and my favorite personal anecdote, how I would go over to friends’ houses and ignore them in favor of examining their bookshelves. Luckily, most of them were cool and didn’t stop being friends with me.
Anyway, back when my brain was still growing and developing and all that young people stuff my ability to read books was just phenomenally weird. I never got tired of it. Never. I would read stuff everywhere because if I didn’t read stuff I might die. I would read anything, and as a first sign of the slight OCD I would develop in later life, I always, always finished what I was reading, good or bad. As a result of this long formed habit, there have been only five books in my entire life that I have not finished because I just couldn’t do it anymore. I bring this up now because I am angry that the very first book I ever consciously put down and decided not to finish — a monumental step, I assure you — I am now being forced to read. I had planned on avoiding it for the rest of my life, and I don’t even remember why I hated it so much, I just remember the hate. Burning, seething. Resentment. I put down James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man at the pinnacle of my high school career, during which my personality can only be described as “panicked,” “type-A,” and “perfectionist,” (qualities that soon disappeared in college as I lost THE FEAR, THE FEAR being the thing crucial to getting all of your work done in a timely and efficient manner). I was in the IB program, if that means anything to you. It was Hell, but it made college so easy.
Whatever. The point of this whole thing is that I wanted to share with you the only five books that have ever failed me, or that made me fail myself, however you prefer to look at it. They are life ruiners.
- – -
A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, James Joyce
Penguin, 1916
Junior year of high school, 2001. My teacher of two years, Mrs. Prather, writes one word on the board: “Bildungsroman.” It’s a funny word, and I would later come to know it well, but for at least three years all it made me think of was this awful book. It has the word “dung” hidden inside of it, but it’s really just a fancy word for a coming of age story. Harry Potter is a bildungsroman. So is Jane Eyre, David Copperfield, To Kill a Mockingbird, and The Aeneid. You should read all of those before you read this book. It is full of asshole. If anyone ever tries to make me read Ulysses (Joyce’s famously obtuse and obnoxiously overlarge “masterpiece”), I will shoot them in the testicle. Anyway, this book was a turning point in my life. It was the first time I realized that I didn’t have to read something if I really didn’t want to.
On Beauty, Zadie Smith
Penguin, 2005
This book is everything I dislike about contemporary fiction and contemporary writers. It’s all words, all brains, and absolutely no soul. The whole time I was reading I felt like Zadie Smith was just trying to impress me or suck up to me or something, except she wasn’t being very smart about it. She was all, LOOK AT MY SNOOTY METAPHOR, IS NOT IT PERFECTION? And I was like, no, you suck and I’m putting your book down and going to read something that wasn’t written for and by somebody who probably thinks that they are too good for Harry Potter. Well, you know what, smart literary ladypants? HARRY POTTER IS TOO GOOD FOR YOU. And yes, I realize this is the second time I have used Harry Potter in an explanation, but I can’t help it. It’s part of my philosophy.
The Names, Don Delillo
Knopf, 1982
Basically, you should just copy and paste my explanation for On Beauty and make it fit this book, except I have some things to add. A lot of “literary” types today think that by adding Europe or the Middle East or European/Middle Eastern intrigue to their books, that makes them “good” and “worthwhile.” Those people are idiots. You could have all the best ingredients in the world but if you mix them together wrong, or if you add too much of one thing (asshole) and not enough of another (humanity, emotion, humor, other good things) your book is going to suck donkey balls, like this one did. I’m surprised I even got as far as page 112, but I was being very stubborn that week. The professor (P.S. I’d forgotten he said all those things. Those were the good ole days) who assigned this book for me to read disappointed me very much by liking it, and blah blah blah Don Delillo wrote White Noise or whatever and blah blah blah IDON’TCARE.
Catch-22, Joseph Heller
Simon & Schuster, 1961
This one is really my fault; I tried to read it during the summer. In college. It felt too much like homework and I got bored and I decided I wanted to read Hitchhiker’s Guide instead, and you know what? That was a good decision. Everybody was all, “Oh, you’ll love Catch-22, it’s so funny!” Even my sister, for Pete’s sake, and she doesn’t even like to read. So, what’s my deal? I have no idea. I even tried to pick it up a couple more times, but I think there’s like a gasket loose in there somewhere that makes me put it down again. I think it’s because I have to be a certain mood for satire, because the only emotions in satire are humor and anger, and while I like humor, I usually like it to be accompanied by joy and love and puppies so . . . whatever. I have issues. (But you knew that.)
Unidentified YA Novel Mother Bought Me at the Bookfair in 1997, ?
?,?
I lied a little bit before when I told you that Joyce was the first author I ever put down and didn’t finish, but I also didn’t lie, because my real first wasn’t intentional. I just forgot about it. In fact, I forgot almost everything about it, including the title, the author, and what it was about. That’s how I know it sucked. The only, ONLY things I remember about it are these: 1) There was a red-headed angry urchin child on the cover; 2) She was wearing gloves and had crazy hair, kinda like this, and 3) It probably took place in an orphanage. I vaguely remember putting it down because the main character was so angry and I was all I DO NOT want to hang out with you, so goodbye. And I didn’t look back (until two days ago, when my futile Google search began, and I started typing idiotic things in the search bar like “red haired girl book cover YA,” “red headed orphan, “why isn’t this working?” “Why can’t I find you?” and “I hate you, Google”. Obviously, didn’t work.)
- – -
So, am I alone in this? Are there books that you refused to finish on principle? Out of anger? For some unknown reason that was probably your fault? Please, share with me. I’ll bring the cookies.
I can think of four books off the top of my head.
1. CATCH-22
I wanted to like it. Still do, actually. My dad liked it and we have somewhat similar taste in books. Plus, the parts of the movie I’ve seen are pretty funny. But, for whatever reason, this just didn’t grab me. I still have it…so, maybe one day.
2. DISCLOSURE, by Michael Crichton
This was the first book Crichton published after I seriously OD’ed on Crichton books one summer in high school. What the hell was wrong with this book? Where were the dinosaurs? The alien viruses? The super-smart gorillas? Not in this book, that’s for sure.
3. THE BOURNE IDENTITY, Robert Ludlum
Technically, I should have loved this book. I like thrillers. And books about espionage. And it’s a cool story. Unfortunately, it’s also a really ham-fisted narrative. Too much telling and not enough showing.
4. THE CONFEDERACY OF DUNCES, by John Kennedy Toole
This was recommended by someone in grad school who was convinced that it was “totally my sense of humor.” I don’t think it is. I didn’t get past the first chapter. I think it might be the only book I’ve ever thrown across the room in anger and disgust.
I’ve always said Confederacy of Dunces is completely overrated, which is SACRILEGE for someone who’s lived in New Orleans. But I’m still saying it.
Y’all really should read Catch-22, though.
I love Dunces. It is so retarded. Oh, MY GOD. As for Catch-22, I’ll probably try again in a couple of years.
I haven’t read the rest, but my only suggestion is that you give Catch-22 another chance. There is a bit of a hill getting into it at the beginning, but once you are over that hill, it gets really good.
That is going to be a long time from now, specifically, when I have finished watching all the TV in the world and after I have my Masters and maybe after some other stuff, too. Maybe if somebody locked me in a room and I had nothing but that book, I could do it.
1. This is one of my most favoritest things you’ve ever written.
2. I was the same way when I was a kid, what with the reading all the time and ignoring everything but books but yeah, there have been some books I couldn’t finish for one reason or another. Catch-22 was one of them and I don’t really blame the book, it’s like you said…I wasn’t in the mood for it at the time.
The first book I ever never finished was Huck Finn, partly because I hated it so hard but mostly because my teacher said there was no way to only read the Cliffs Notes and get an A on the test and so I had to prove her wrong.
Wow, this is long that’s what she said.
I liked Huck Finn, but probably because I wasn’t forced to read it until college. I really feel like there are certain books that people in high school will never understand, so why bother?
I agree. I started going back and rereading books from high school that I thought I hated and it turns out I was just really dumb in high school.
A few years ago I tried reading Catcher in the Rye since I never had to for school. At the time going back to a high school reading list seemed like a good idea. HATED it and went back to reading stuff I like instead of what someone else thinks I should.
I, too, put down Catch-22. Not so much due to it sucking, but more because I though Yosarian was too annoying for me to continue taking any interest. In high school, I had to write a report on The Deerslayer. The Last of the Mohicans has it’s strong points (i.e. the story), but The Deerslayer is 18th century writing that you have to try and swim through in order to find the plot. It’s like swimming through overly-wordy, poorly-written syrup (just trust me). And as much as I love Mark Twain’s essays, some of his books are tedious to the extreme (Life on the Mississippi, specifically).
Man, what is it about Catch-22 that makes it impossible to get into for most of us. I, too, am on that list.
I was recently given a book by a friend. It was her(or his) newly published book actually. I read the beginning, skimmed the middle, and found something at the end to remark upon….but just couldn’t actually “read” it.
I think that may be the first book I’ve never read all the way through.
And obviously I’m not going to say the title….
But anybody who knows me and has given me a book of theirs recently? I’m not talking about YOUR book, it was totally someone else’s book.
And btw I read Catch 22 and loved it but I was seventeen, surly and cranky recovering from a car wreck at the time….sooooooo…the drugs may have helped….:0)
Was the last book The Great Gilly Hopkins by any chance? It was about an angry, red haired orphan.
Nope, I’ve read that one and quite enjoyed it. It was some book that probably nobody has read.
No actually it’s selling quite well. lol ….and he/she is a mid list author who’s been published a lot. *I* just couldn’t get into it. :0)
(sticks tongue out at you in a ladylike way)
sorry about giving you a heart attack this morning with my post.
and oh my gosh, one of your tweets in your sidebar just about killed me…
oh hey, does that make us even?